The Vision of Ezekiel represented the Messianic Ideal as speculated upon by the Judaic Nation upon its release from Babylonia by the Persian King Cyrus The Great in 539 BCE; but the Line of David was annihilated in 586 BCE. There was no going back. That the later Christian sect falsely viewed itself as having being “descended from King David” is a historical fraud that is kept hermetically sealed from the General Public. The elements found within Ezekiel were later adopted by the Christian sect and developed into the symbolism of the Four Evangelists of Jesus Christ, which is too much of a coincidence. Why are there Four Gospels named after the Four Evangelists, it may be speculated since there is no Christian text confirming the obvious. Ezekiel's Vision 1:4-11 is directly correlated with the Vision of Revelation 4:6-9.

Michael Baigent wasted his life away speculating about the “Line of David” that “existed” after 586 BCE, even becoming a Freemason in the vain hope of finding clues; Dan Brown who wrote “The Da Vinci Code” in 2003, as was stated on his website, was based on the same “fact“ that Michael Baigent believed in, he should take note. We may pity authors like Margaret Starbird, Laurence Gardner, Tim Wallace Murphy, Niven Sinclair, and all the others who believed in the “factual existence of the Line of David” – not to mention all the other many authors who wrote novels dedicated to this ”fact”.

Quoting Artificial Intelligence: “The Line of David is a core element of biblical history and theology. While it is debated by scholars, it is not regarded as a ‘hoax’ in the context of historical research.”

It is a hoax. The only way it cannot be a “hoax” is only if someone believes in the Articles of Christian Faith. Here is a resumption of the Historical Jesus Christ, that it is not secular history but instead religious history and this is the BASIC MISTAKE OF ALL SECULAR HISTORIANS that are a part of the history and legacy of Christian Western Civilization. Secular Historians are under heavy obligation to observe the myth of Christianity as “real” because of Historical circumstance – breaking their adherence to historical objectivity.

France and subsequently the Grand Orient of French Freemasonry made Christianity illegal following the Revolution, but the religion was too deeply “fossilised” within Society, and Napoleon Bonaparte had to restart Christianity. But then followed the separation between Church and State in France in 1905 as part of the struggle between the Republic and their opposition: “monarchists (Legitimists, Orleanists, Bonapartists), who wanted a king, alongside conservatives, clericals, and later, radicals and socialists who challenged the monarchists – with figures like General Boulanger – also forming anti-republican movements later in the century, all opposing republicanism's shift towards secularism and democracy.”

As for the American Revolution and its Independence from Great Britain, that was similar to the French Model but rather than banning Christianity outright, America declared that all religions were equal, and its values were generally based upon the principles and values of The Enlightenment. It was not until the Great Depression that Christianity re-established a comeback. Today, there is an ongoing conflict between Christian and Secular values in America. The United States, like France, exists without a Christian Primate standing alongside its respective Leader.

In Europe, Spanish Monarchy is usually described as The Monarchy, but in essence it is officially a Constitutional Monarchy, the same as in the United Kingdom – whereby the Monarch is Head of State (ceremonial) and the Prime Minister is Head of Government – The Ruling Power.

Western Civilization has been brainwashed into accepting an offshoot and a parasite of Judaism – a Judaic order that practiced extreme beliefs and was something far more alien to what it is today. Today's historians are merely the subjective and obedient servants of this delusional “alleged history” and not its objective commentators.