Quoting the spam by Jauclin: “I have been interested in this enigma for over thirty years and my opinion has evolved a lot because I do not hesitate to reject a hypothesis when it turns out to be false”, before trying to tie in the work of boring Boudet with the equally boring Large Parchment by Philippe de Chérisey, that is full of spelling mistakes pretending to be of the Latin script, because de Chérisey failed to understand the language...

It was only Gérard de Sède who first mentioned Boudet as being part of the “mystery” – Noël Corbu did not mention boring Boudet at all – and of course the “mystery” itself was first invented by Noël Corbu – there was no “mystery” before the mid-1950s. Jauclin has only totally brainwashed himself into believing the “mystery” without PROVING THAT IT EXISTS.

Then, on a different website, comes the hilarious comment “faking the list of donors” by someone who has not even come up-to-date about the so-called mystery – of course the List of Donors are FAKE! No serious researcher who is knowledgeable about Abbé Saunière disputes that! The List of Donors was probably made-up by Abbé Saunière's solicitor during the 1910-1911 Trial, because the List contains his handwriting.

Of course, what our “knowledgeable expert” is really referring to is Abbé Saunière's Trafficking in Masses, that is something totally different, and which Abbé Saunière kept quietly under his bed, falsely claiming that he did not keep records of the masses he sold.

Laurent Buccholtzer’s book is mentioned and he answers his own question by presenting the theory about the French Clergyman's Directory, later on in his own book. I suggest that the person concerned should read Buccholtzer's book.

These BELIEVERS, that call themselves “researchers”, should know that not all of Abbé Saunière's paperwork has been made public, therefore they are wrong with their assumptions. Furthermore, that what has been revealed can be shown to adequately cover Abbé Saunière's expenditure. The 250,000 francs would have easily paid for all of it. Furthermore, the work done by various tradespeople for Abbé Saunière wasn't all that great, since deep cracks began appearing by the 1990s.

If you want to read a critical overview of the book by Laurent Buccholtzer then I suggest you read “L’Histoire Rêvée de Rennes-le-Château: Eclairages sur un Récit Collectif Contemporain” by David Rossoni (2010). The Believers like to quote what they think are “facts” but they never read the skeptical books.

Finally, we KNOW that Abbé Saunière was guilty of telling lies – and also of repeating lies. For example about the “dalle de Chevaliers” and the “Visigothic Pillar” – both of which date from the time of Abbé Saunière. Abbé Saunière also falsely claimed that Rennes-le-Château was Rhedae.

Two things can really be discounted – the utter rubbish of the “Jesus Bloodline” and the notion of a “treasure discovery”. This nonsense can be discounted.