Despite all his rhetoric, “Isaac Ben Jacob” has miserably failed to prove anything at all because he lacks the most important salient point to any investigation: EVIDENCE.

His latest book is full of nonsense. For one thing it contains reinterpretations of Gérard de Sède’s points that bear no relation to what his original meanings were, but has produced misinterpretations to suit his agenda and purpose. His book contains numerous faults in such logic.

It is at least important for all people to try and behave logically, and if they have made a discovery, they should show the evidence in practice and not in theory, as “Isaac Ben Jacob” is doing. He has not provided any evidence, he is merely promising his readers that his “logical” trait is pointing towards it.

It’s good to see that Howard Cartert did no such thing and made the discovery of the tomb of Tutankhamun BEFORE he made any such promises – that he produced his material evidence and claims in public simultaneously.

The fault that lies with “Isaac Ben Jacob” is the very same mistake made by everyone from Noël Corbu to Christian Doumergue, from André Douzet to Franck Daffos, from the authors of “The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail” to Paul Saussez – they have all either made or are making statements of their so-called “discovery” or “discoveries” IN FRONT of actually finding anything out or have presented any evidence to substantiate the various theories.

So to repeat the obvious yet again – the merit of Rennes-le-Château lies in its ability to establish various addictions based on emotional excitement rather than on producing evidential results.

So far – to date – the treasure, mystery, genealogy and secret of Rennes-le-Château adds up to nothing more than faith and wishful thinking. Drawing conclusions before getting evidence is simply putting the cart before the horse.